<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Gábor's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nekomancer.net/blog/2008/03/30/mysql-vs-postgresql-homepage"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.nekomancer.net/node/157/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.nekomancer.net/node/157/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-03-30T16:53:40-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>MySQL homepage vs. PostgreSQL homepage</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.nekomancer.net/blog/2008/03/30/mysql-vs-postgresql-homepage" />
    <id>http://www.nekomancer.net/blog/2008/03/30/mysql-vs-postgresql-homepage</id>
    <published>2008-03-30T16:37:14-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-30T16:53:40-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>gabor</name>
    </author>
    <category term="computers" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I always used PostgreSQL, never MySQL. The reason was simply that at work first i had to work with PostgreSQL, and later i simply saw no reason to switch to MySQL. For me they both seem to offer pretty much the same functionality/performance these days.</p>

<p>But what i&#8217;d like to talk about here, is their home pages: <a href="http://www.mysql.com/">MySQL</a> and <a href="http://www.postgresql.org/">PostgreSQL</a>.</p>

<p>Most of time i work with open-source/free software, and i got used to the way their home pages are created/behave. and let me tell you this: if i would have to choose today between MySQL and PostgreSQL purely based on their home pages, i would never ever choose MySQL. Their  web page is just similar to the  usual full-of-bullshit commercial-product web pages, which i learned to hate. The only missing thing is the photo of some happy-guy-in-a-suit holding a copy of MySQL.</p>

<p>Or, let&#8217;s try a simple test: How fast can you find the download-link for the latest version of MySQL?</p>

<ul>
<li>with Postgresql, it&#8217;s right there on the home page, on the right side of the page.</li>
<li>with MySQL, the first download-like-thing you find is some 30-day-trial&#8230; (WHAT? A TRIAL? ISN&#8217;T THIS GPL???) . below i can either DISCOVER it, or TEST DRIVE it or LEARN it or read the WHAT&#8217;S NEW section&#8230; but no DOWNLOAD. well, but if you check more, you can find the small &#8216;download&#8217; link in the TEST DRIVE section. now you get to a new page, where they try very much to persuade me to buy a commercial version. but, if i prefer to do everything by myself, and accept that there will be no binary builds after every update/bugfix, i can download the free version</li>
</ul>

<p>i understand the reason for the piece-of-shit web page. MySQL is dual-licensed, there is a commercial version, and there is a company behind it that is trying to sell it. but the problem is that because of this, the &#8220;free&#8221; version is basically shown as a worse version. and that&#8217;s not the best way to look good to programmers using free/open-source software.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I always used PostgreSQL, never MySQL. The reason was simply that at work first i had to work with PostgreSQL, and later i simply saw no reason to switch to MySQL. For me they both seem to offer pretty much the same functionality/performance these days.</p>

<p>But what i&#8217;d like to talk about here, is their home pages: <a href="http://www.mysql.com/">MySQL</a> and <a href="http://www.postgresql.org/">PostgreSQL</a>.</p>

<p>Most of time i work with open-source/free software, and i got used to the way their home pages are created/behave. and let me tell you this: if i would have to choose today between MySQL and PostgreSQL purely based on their home pages, i would never ever choose MySQL. Their  web page is just similar to the  usual full-of-bullshit commercial-product web pages, which i learned to hate. The only missing thing is the photo of some happy-guy-in-a-suit holding a copy of MySQL.</p>

<p>Or, let&#8217;s try a simple test: How fast can you find the download-link for the latest version of MySQL?</p>

<ul>
<li>with Postgresql, it&#8217;s right there on the home page, on the right side of the page.</li>
<li>with MySQL, the first download-like-thing you find is some 30-day-trial&#8230; (WHAT? A TRIAL? ISN&#8217;T THIS GPL???) . below i can either DISCOVER it, or TEST DRIVE it or LEARN it or read the WHAT&#8217;S NEW section&#8230; but no DOWNLOAD. well, but if you check more, you can find the small &#8216;download&#8217; link in the TEST DRIVE section. now you get to a new page, where they try very much to persuade me to buy a commercial version. but, if i prefer to do everything by myself, and accept that there will be no binary builds after every update/bugfix, i can download the free version</li>
</ul>

<p>i understand the reason for the piece-of-shit web page. MySQL is dual-licensed, there is a commercial version, and there is a company behind it that is trying to sell it. but the problem is that because of this, the &#8220;free&#8221; version is basically shown as a worse version. and that&#8217;s not the best way to look good to programmers using free/open-source software.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
